Which statement best describes a political map compared to a physical map?

Which statement best describes a political map compared to a physical map?

• A. A political map shows borders and human-made features.
• B. A physical map shows natural features like mountains and rivers.
• C. A political map shows climate zones.
• D. A political map shows population density and climate.

Answer: (D)

Political maps focus on human-made boundaries and places. They show borders between countries, states, or provinces, and mark cities, capitals, and often major roads or other human features. Because of this emphasis, describing a political map as showing borders and human-made features is the best way to capture what these maps convey. A physical map, by contrast, highlights natural features like mountains, rivers, and coastlines. Climate zones belong to climate or thematic maps, and population density is typically shown on thematic maps as well, not on political maps. So the statement about borders and human-made features best describes a political map.

Political maps focus on human-made boundaries and places. They show borders between countries, states, or provinces, and mark cities, capitals, and often major roads or other human features. Because of this emphasis, describing a political map as showing borders and human-made features is the best way to capture what these maps convey.

A physical map, by contrast, highlights natural features like mountains, rivers, and coastlines. Climate zones belong to climate or thematic maps, and population density is typically shown on thematic maps as well, not on political maps. So the statement about borders and human-made features best describes a political map.